REC-ADMN

Recruitment and administration

The Recruitment and administration pillar governs the full participant operations system, including sourcing, screening, scheduling, consent, privacy, incentives, participant records, communications, reporting and learning.

Operating question

How are participants sourced, invited, consented, supported, paid, tracked and protected throughout the research lifecycle?

Recruitment operations should reduce delivery friction while protecting participants, improving sample quality and making the real cost and value of participant access visible.

REC-ADMN 1.0.0

Recruitment operating model

How teams decide whether recruitment is self-service, full-service or hybrid.

P

REC-ADMN 1.1.1

Participant access is part of the research operating system

Recruitment must be designed as a system of sourcing, screening, consent, records, scheduling, incentives and learning, not treated as isolated administration.

Type
Principle
Status
draft
Effective date
2026-07-02
Applies to
ResearchOps, Researchers, Research leaders
Evidence
recruitment-operating-model, service-model-decision
R

REC-ADMN 1.1.2

Classify recruitment support before outreach starts

A study must be classified as self-service, full-service or hybrid before any participant outreach, with the decision based on risk, audience sensitivity, access needs, timescale and sample complexity.

Type
Rule
Status
draft
Effective date
2026-07-02
Applies to
Study leads, ResearchOps
Evidence
recruitment-risk-rating, support-model-decision
Templates
TPL-RESEARCH-INTAKE, TPL-RISK-ASSESSMENT
G

REC-ADMN 1.1.3

Reserve full-service recruitment for material risk or specialist access

Use full-service recruitment where participant harm, safeguarding, legal sensitivity, hard-to-reach access, high-profile stakeholders or complex incentives require specialist coordination.

Type
Guidance
Status
draft
Effective date
2026-07-02
Applies to
ResearchOps, Research leaders
Evidence
support-triage-notes, capacity-plan
C

REC-ADMN 1.1.4

Do not make participants carry operational confusion

People coordinating recruitment must give participants clear information, timely updates and a single route for questions, changes or withdrawal.

Type
Conduct
Status
draft
Effective date
2026-07-02
Applies to
Recruitment coordinators, Researchers, ResearchOps
Evidence
participant-communications, contact-route

REC-ADMN 2.0.0

Participant sourcing and screening

How participant sources, sample plans and screeners are selected and reviewed.

R

REC-ADMN 2.1.1

Approve the sample rationale

The study lead must document and review the sample rationale, inclusion and exclusion criteria, source channels and known bias risks before screening begins.

Type
Rule
Status
draft
Effective date
2026-07-02
Applies to
Study leads, Researchers
Evidence
sample-plan, screener-review
Templates
TPL-RESEARCH-PLAN
G

REC-ADMN 2.1.2

Use more than one source where bias would damage the decision

Where a single panel, agency, staff list or community route would distort findings, use mixed sourcing and record the trade-offs.

Type
Guidance
Status
draft
Effective date
2026-07-02
Applies to
Researchers, Recruitment coordinators
Evidence
sourcing-plan, bias-risk-note
C

REC-ADMN 2.1.3

Screen without extracting unnecessary personal information

Screening questions must be relevant, proportionate and written so participants can understand why information is being requested.

Type
Conduct
Status
draft
Effective date
2026-07-02
Applies to
Researchers, Recruitment coordinators
Evidence
screener, privacy-review

REC-ADMN 3.0.0

Consent, privacy and participant records

How consent, privacy notices and participant records are created, stored, amended and retired.

R

REC-ADMN 3.1.1

Record informed consent before research participation

Participants must receive clear study information and give recorded informed consent before taking part, including consent choices for recording, quotation and future contact.

Type
Rule
Status
draft
Effective date
2026-07-02
Applies to
Researchers, Recruitment coordinators, Study leads
Evidence
consent-form, consent-log
Templates
TPL-CONSENT-FORM, TPL-CONSENT-LOG, TPL-CONSENT-PRIVACY-STATEMENT
Related routes
/pages/consent/
R

REC-ADMN 3.1.2

Separate participant identity from research evidence

Participant contact details and direct identifiers must be stored separately from notes, recordings, transcripts and findings unless an approved exception is recorded.

Type
Rule
Status
draft
Effective date
2026-07-02
Applies to
Researchers, ResearchOps, Repository curators
Evidence
data-map, repository-entry, exception-record
Templates
TPL-REPOSITORY-ENTRY
G

REC-ADMN 3.1.3

Treat panels as living data products

Participant panels should have named ownership, consent refresh points, retention rules, suppression lists, audit trails and a routine process for removing stale or unsuitable records.

Type
Guidance
Status
draft
Effective date
2026-07-02
Applies to
ResearchOps, Panel owners, Information asset owners
Evidence
panel-register, retention-schedule, audit-log
Templates
TPL-PARTICIPANT-PANEL-SCHEMA

REC-ADMN 4.0.0

Incentives and participant care

How incentives, reimbursement, accessibility support and participant wellbeing are handled.

P

REC-ADMN 4.1.1

Incentives should recognise effort without creating pressure

Incentives and reimbursements should be fair, timely and proportionate to participant effort, while avoiding undue influence or exclusion.

Type
Principle
Status
draft
Effective date
2026-07-02
Applies to
ResearchOps, Researchers, Finance approvers
Evidence
incentive-policy, study-incentive-decision
Templates
TPL-INCENTIVE-POLICY
R

REC-ADMN 4.1.2

Record incentive decisions and payment status

The team must record the incentive offered, approval basis, fulfilment route, payment status and unresolved payment issues for each participant who is due an incentive.

Type
Rule
Status
draft
Effective date
2026-07-02
Applies to
Recruitment coordinators, ResearchOps
Evidence
incentive-log, payment-status
Templates
TPL-RECRUITMENT-STATUS
C

REC-ADMN 4.1.3

Respect withdrawal and non-attendance

Teams must handle withdrawal, late cancellation and non-attendance without blame, while recording operational impact so future planning improves.

Type
Conduct
Status
draft
Effective date
2026-07-02
Applies to
Researchers, Recruitment coordinators
Evidence
withdrawal-record, attendance-log

REC-ADMN 5.0.0

Scheduling and communications

How participants, researchers and observers are kept aligned before, during and after sessions.

R

REC-ADMN 5.1.1

Confirm session logistics in writing

Participants must receive written confirmation of session time, channel or location, access support, preparation needs, incentive terms, withdrawal route and contact details.

Type
Rule
Status
draft
Effective date
2026-07-02
Applies to
Recruitment coordinators, Researchers
Evidence
joining-instructions, communication-log
G

REC-ADMN 5.1.2

Automate routine reminders after the wording is safe

Use scheduling and reminder automation for repeatable logistics, but review message content for plain language, privacy, access needs and the ability to reply to a person.

Type
Guidance
Status
draft
Effective date
2026-07-02
Applies to
ResearchOps, Recruitment coordinators
Evidence
message-template-review, automation-settings
Related routes
/pages/sessions/
C

REC-ADMN 5.1.3

Keep observers behind the participant relationship

Observers must not contact participants directly unless the study plan assigns that responsibility and participants have been told.

Type
Conduct
Status
draft
Effective date
2026-07-02
Applies to
Observers, Researchers, Recruitment coordinators
Evidence
observer-brief, participant-contact-plan

REC-ADMN 6.0.0

Reporting and operational learning

How recruitment performance, participant experience and operating risks are reviewed.

R

REC-ADMN 6.1.1

Review recruitment performance after fieldwork

The study record must include planned sample, achieved sample, source effectiveness, no-show rate, incentive issues, access needs met, unresolved risks and recommendations for future recruitment.

Type
Rule
Status
draft
Effective date
2026-07-02
Applies to
Study leads, ResearchOps
Evidence
recruitment-closeout, participant-status-log
Templates
TPL-RECRUITMENT-STATUS
G

REC-ADMN 6.1.2

Turn recruitment learning into reusable operations

Where the same recruitment issue appears across studies, treat it as an operating-system improvement candidate rather than a one-off delivery problem.

Type
Guidance
Status
draft
Effective date
2026-07-02
Applies to
ResearchOps, Research leaders
Evidence
operations-backlog-item, trend-review
P

REC-ADMN 6.1.3

Measure recruitment by quality and care, not only speed

Recruitment performance should balance time, cost, sample fit, representation, participant experience, researcher effort and risk reduction.

Type
Principle
Status
draft
Effective date
2026-07-02
Applies to
ResearchOps, Research leaders
Evidence
service-metrics, participant-feedback, quality-review

Glossary

Support model
The decision about whether recruitment is self-service, full-service or hybrid.
Sample rationale
The documented reason a participant group, source and screening approach are appropriate for the research question.
Participant record
The operational record used to manage contact, consent, scheduling, incentive and participation status.

Change history

  1. 2026-07-02

    Converted REC-ADMN into the reference-quality clause model with operating model, recruitment, consent, incentives, scheduling and learning sections.